<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leap seconds.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wingo</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=37#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Very neat explanation, and neat bug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very neat explanation, and neat bug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on leap seconds. &#124; codemonkey.org.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>More on leap seconds. &#124; codemonkey.org.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 03:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=37#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Keating made a comment in my previous post on leap seconds, which I thought was worth highlighting in another post, for the benefit of those who don&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keating made a comment in my previous post on leap seconds, which I thought was worth highlighting in another post, for the benefit of those who don&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkeating</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>jkeating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 02:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=37#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It could be &lt;a href=&quot;http://zuneinsider.com/archive/2008/12/31/30gb-zune-issues-official-update.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;worse...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be <a href="http://zuneinsider.com/archive/2008/12/31/30gb-zune-issues-official-update.aspx" rel="nofollow">worse&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leap Second : Bob Plankers, The Lone Sysadmin</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2008/12/31/leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Leap Second : Bob Plankers, The Lone Sysadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=37#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Jones&#8217; post reminded me that tonight we have a leap second. 23:59:59 will be followed by 23:59:60. Wikipedia saves me the trouble of explaining why: Leap seconds are necessary because time is measured using stable atomic clocks (TAI or International Atomic Time), whereas the rotation of Earth slows down continually, though at a slightly variable rate. Originally, the second was defined as 1/86400 of a mean solar day (see solar time) as determined by the rotation of the Earth around its axis. By the middle of the 20th century it was apparent that the rotation of the Earth did not provide a sufficiently uniform time standard and in 1956 the second was redefined in terms of the annual orbital revolution of the Earth around the Sun. In 1967 the second was redefined, once again, in terms of a physical property: the oscillations of an atom of Caesium-133, which were measurable by an atomic clock. But the solar day becomes 1.7 ms longer every century due mainly to tidal friction (2.3 ms/cy, reduced by 0.6 ms/cy due to glacial rebound). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Jones&#8217; post reminded me that tonight we have a leap second. 23:59:59 will be followed by 23:59:60. Wikipedia saves me the trouble of explaining why: Leap seconds are necessary because time is measured using stable atomic clocks (TAI or International Atomic Time), whereas the rotation of Earth slows down continually, though at a slightly variable rate. Originally, the second was defined as 1/86400 of a mean solar day (see solar time) as determined by the rotation of the Earth around its axis. By the middle of the 20th century it was apparent that the rotation of the Earth did not provide a sufficiently uniform time standard and in 1956 the second was redefined in terms of the annual orbital revolution of the Earth around the Sun. In 1967 the second was redefined, once again, in terms of a physical property: the oscillations of an atom of Caesium-133, which were measurable by an atomic clock. But the solar day becomes 1.7 ms longer every century due mainly to tidal friction (2.3 ms/cy, reduced by 0.6 ms/cy due to glacial rebound). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
