<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora 11 released, onwards to F12.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/06/19/fedora-11-released-onwards-f12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/06/19/fedora-11-released-onwards-f12/</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jspaleta</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/06/19/fedora-11-released-onwards-f12/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>jspaleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=183#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Please, take your your time no rush.

Extra bonus points if you end up with a general purpose script that can be re-run against other packages in Fedora cvs, so we can get a feel of how we are doing generally with regard to upstreaming patchsets.

-jef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, take your your time no rush.</p>
<p>Extra bonus points if you end up with a general purpose script that can be re-run against other packages in Fedora cvs, so we can get a feel of how we are doing generally with regard to upstreaming patchsets.</p>
<p>-jef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davej</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/06/19/fedora-11-released-onwards-f12/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=183#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I could do that. Will take a bit of time to do it.  I&#039;ll see if I can get to it next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I could do that. Will take a bit of time to do it.  I&#8217;ll see if I can get to it next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jspaleta</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/06/19/fedora-11-released-onwards-f12/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>jspaleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=183#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I wonder,
Can you visualize the patch load across multiple Fedora releases?
Is the Fedora kernel&#039;s patch load steadily decreasing in time?

Can you define patch load as the raw number  of line of patched code and graph that together with the total number of lines of kernel code?

-jef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder,<br />
Can you visualize the patch load across multiple Fedora releases?<br />
Is the Fedora kernel&#8217;s patch load steadily decreasing in time?</p>
<p>Can you define patch load as the raw number  of line of patched code and graph that together with the total number of lines of kernel code?</p>
<p>-jef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
