<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When acpi-cpufreq fails.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/07/21/acpicpufreq-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/07/21/acpicpufreq-fails/</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: davej</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/07/21/acpicpufreq-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=208#comment-161</guid>
		<description>There are other factors involved. The exact same CPU on two different motherboards may offer different frequencies. Things like the quality/implementation of parts like the voltage regulators affect the stability of the platform, so some vendors may choose not to offer certain frequencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other factors involved. The exact same CPU on two different motherboards may offer different frequencies. Things like the quality/implementation of parts like the voltage regulators affect the stability of the platform, so some vendors may choose not to offer certain frequencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bennee</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/07/21/acpicpufreq-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bennee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=208#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Forgive my ignorance of the implementation details of x86 hardware but aren&#039;t P-states a function of the processor hardware? Why does the BIOS have to get involved in determining what states the processor can handle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my ignorance of the implementation details of x86 hardware but aren&#8217;t P-states a function of the processor hardware? Why does the BIOS have to get involved in determining what states the processor can handle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
