<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>codemonkey.org.uk &#187; X25-E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/tag/x25-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk</link>
	<description>Dave Jones' Linux &#38; opensource stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:15:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</title>
		<link>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davej</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X25-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst on the subject of storage, this is just obscene. Four Intel X25-E SSD&#8217;s in RAID 0. Those are the SLC variants too, which are still ridiculously expensive (Currently $447 for a 32GB one). So $2k for an average read speed of ~560MB/s is impressive, though a little out of my (and most peoples) price [...]<p><a href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/">Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>



No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst on the subject of storage, <a href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/16291">this</a> is just obscene.<br />
Four Intel X25-E SSD&#8217;s in RAID 0. Those are the SLC variants too, which are still <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001P4X2AA?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=codemonkey07-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B001P4X2AA">ridiculously expensive</a>  (Currently $447 for a 32GB one).</p>
<p>So $2k for an average read speed of ~560MB/s is impressive, though a little out of my (and most peoples) price range.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of why RAID0 of my two cheap MLC SSDs didn&#8217;t yield any noticable improvements at all.<br />
No matter what I tried, I was bound to the performance of a single disk (~80MB/s).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/">Four X25-E SSDs in RAID-0</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.codemonkey.org.uk">codemonkey.org.uk</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/27/x25e-ssds-raid0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
